To help agencies submit accurate and high-quality biometric images and criminal history data enabling reliable and consistent searches, the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division offers biometric and criminal history training free of charge to all authorized agencies.
Fbi Faces 40 Free 11
Aside from the obvious suitability issues raised by the underlying conduct engaged in by the applicant or officer, which should be considered by the agency, Hayes may impact hiring and retaining officers by law enforcement agencies. For example, if a misdemeanor conviction pertaining to a crime of violence surfaces during the investigation, the department must determine whether the crime involved someone who had a domestic relationship with the applicant or officer.
On October 5, 1985, Platt and Matix murdered 25-year-old Emilio Briel while he was target shooting at a rock pit. The pair stole Briel's car and used it to commit several robberies. Briel's remains were found in March 1986 but not identified until May. On October 10, 1985, five days after killing Briel, Platt and Matix attempted to rob a Wells Fargo armored truck that was servicing a Winn-Dixie supermarket. After ordering him to freeze, one of the pair shot a guard in the leg with a shotgun while the other fired a handgun and shoulder weapons from the getaway vehicle. Two other guards returned fire, but neither Platt nor Matix was wounded. No money was taken in the botched robbery, but the injured guard later died from his wound. A few weeks later, on November 8, 1985, the two robbed the Professional Savings Bank in Miami, taking $41,469 in three Wells Fargo Armored Car Company money bags that had been delivered that morning.
Toxicology tests showed that the abilities of Platt and Matix to fight through multiple traumatic gunshot wounds and continue to battle and attempt to escape were not achieved through any chemical means. Both of their bodies were drug-free at the time of their deaths.
When Reagan took office the economy was one of double-digit inflation and interest rates near 20%. During the campaign Reagan promised to restore the free market from excessive government regulation and encourage private initiative and enterprise.
The economic gains, however, came at a cost of a record annual deficit and a ballooning national debt. The budget deficit was exacerbated by a trade deficit. Americans continued to buy more foreign-made goods than they were selling. Reagan, however adhered to his free trade stance, and was the primary proponent of the Free Trade Agreement with Canada, which evolved into the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). He also signed, reluctantly, trade legislation designed to open foreign markets to U.S. goods.
In Middle East affairs, Reagan reported in his inaugural address that the 52 American hostages held in Iran for 444 days were at that moment being released and would soon return to freedom. The President maintained a firm stance against terrorism, exemplified by the American retaliating against Libya for an air attack in 1981 and again in 1986 for the death of Americans in a Berlin discotheque. Reagan's peacekeeping force in war-torn Lebanon experienced tragedy in 1983 when a truck bomb killed 241 soldiers. Tragedy struck again in 1987 when a missile from an Iraqi warplane killed 37 sailors aboard the U.S.S. Stark, part of a U.S. naval taskforce which had been sent to the Persian Gulf to keep that waterway open during the Iran-Iraq war.
The darkest hour of the Reagan administration would become known as the Iran-Contra affair. After lengthy, nationally televised hearings, a special congressional hearings review board reported that Reagan authorized the sale of arms to Iran in exchange for help in freeing U.S. hostages in Lebanon. Investigations revealed the money gained from the arms sale was illegally diverted to aid the Contras, opponents of the Nicaraguan Sandinista government. The congressional report criticized Reagan for his detached, hands-off style of management. In the aftermath of the affair, National Security Advisors Robert McFarlane and John Poindexter, as well as National Security Council aide Colonel Oliver North were indicted by a federal grand jury and convicted of various charges regarding the Iran-Contra operations. McFarlane was later pardoned by President George H.W. Bush and both Poindexter and North's convictions were set aside on appeal for technical reasons.
The EEOC's Publication Center has many free documents on the Title I employment provisions of the ADA, including both the statute, 42 U.S.C. . 12101 et seq. (1994), and the regulations, 29 C.F.R. . 1630 (1997). In addition, the EEOC has published a great deal of basic information about reasonable accommodation and undue hardship. The two main sources of interpretive information are: (1) the Interpretive Guidance accompanying the Title I regulations (also known as the \"Appendix\" to the regulations), 29 C.F.R. pt. 1630 app. .. 1630.2(o), (p), 1630.9 (1997) , and (2) A Technical Assistance Manual on the Employment Provisions (Title I) of the Americans with Disabilities Act III, 8 FEP Manual (BNA) 405:6981, 6998-7018 (1992). The Manual includes a 200-page Resource Directory, including federal and state agencies, and disability organizations that can provide assistance in identifying and locating reasonable accommodations.
Vice President's Remarks at the KCI Expo CenterKansas City, Missouri 11:40 A.M. CDT THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you all very much. Somehow this makesme very nervous to be surrounded by this many law enforcementofficers. I'm delighted to be here this morning and thank you for thewarm welcome to Kansas City. And I want to thank you, Larry, for thatkind introduction and also for your years of service to the nation. I was here not long ago to campaign with Congressman Sam Graves,who is able to join us today, and I've been looking forward to comingback. (Applause.) And I'm honored to bring you best wishes from a man with friends inevery corner of Missouri, President George W. Bush. The President and I are tremendously grateful to all of oursupporters here in Missouri. We were proud to carry this state in2000. The election, though five months away, we're going to doeverything we can to work hard to earn your vote once again. With yourdedication, and with the strong leadership of our President, Missouriis going to be part of a nationwide victory for George W. Bush onNovember 2nd. (Applause.) Your senators aren't here today, but as President of the Senate, Ican speak with some authority on their performance on the job. I'mproud to tell you that Kit Bond and Jim Talent are doing superb workfor the people of Missouri. And I might also add that your formersenator and governor John Ashcroft is doing a great job as AttorneyGeneral of the United States. (Applause.) I also want to thank all of the law enforcement personnel and firstresponders here today. Just about everybody, at one time or another,has needed your help or watched you at work. Your fellow citizensrespect your discipline, your presence of mind, and your courage. AndI'm proud that you're with us today. All of us in public office are serving during a time when Americahas confronted historic challenges and risen to meet tests that wenever expected to face. The past three and a half years have demandedserious choices, with alternatives carrying profound consequences. Theattacks on September 11th, 2001 signaled the arrival of an entirely newera. In the space of a few hours, we saw the violence and the griefthat 19 murderous men can inflict. And we had a glimpse of the evengreater harm that terrorists wish to do to us. Remembering what we sawon the morning of 9/11, and knowing the nature of these enemies, wehave a clear, overriding responsibility: We must do everything in ourpower to protect our homeland, and to prevent another terrorist attackon America. (Applause.) Since those terror attacks, our nation has pursued an aggressivestrategy against an organized and a determined enemy. We understandthat it's not enough to simply prosecute a series of crimes after aviolent attack has occurred. Good defenses are not enough. To fullyremove this danger, we have only one option. We must go on offense,and we will take the fight to the enemy, and we will prevail.(Applause.) We are waging war in this war on terror in many fronts. We aretracking, capturing, and destroying terrorists from the caves ofAfghanistan, to the Philippines, to the Horn of Africa. We arefighting weapons proliferation at every source -- whether the threatcomes from outlaw regimes, or from black-market operations -- to guardAmerica against catastrophic attack and against blackmail. We areapplying the Bush doctrine, which holds that any person or regime thatharbors terrorists is equally guilty of terrorist crimes and will beheld to account. And the Taliban regime in Afghanistan found out thatAmerica means exactly what we say. (Applause.) In Iraq, we took another essential step in the war on terror. Witha coalition of many nations, the United States rid the Iraqi people ofa murderous dictator and rid the world of a gathering threat to ourpeace and security. Because we and our coalition acted, the dictatorwho once brutalized a country now sits in a prison cell. And the worldcan be certain that the dictator and his sons will never again sponsorterrorists, never again endanger Iraqis' neighbors, never againthreaten the United States of America. (Applause.) Watching these developments, Colonel Moammar Ghadafi, in Libya,decided the time had come for him to end his efforts to develop nuclearweapons and to turn over to U.S. officials the uranium feed stock, theequipment needed to enrich and produce weapons-grade material, anddesign for a nuclear weapon. The key supplier of this deadlytechnology was a man named A.Q. Khan.